<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Caroline Beavon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carolinebeavon.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carolinebeavon.com</link>
	<description>online journalism / data journalism / visualizations / social media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 11:31:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 10 Crimes of Online Writing by How long should online content be?</title>
		<link>http://carolinebeavon.com/2011/03/04/top-10-crimes-of-online-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-6140</link>
		<dc:creator>How long should online content be?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 11:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carolinebeavon.com/?p=3255#comment-6140</guid>
		<description>[...] Mobile &#8211; with the increase in mobile browsing, we cannot ignore the necessity for even shorter content. They are prepared to scroll, but not endlessly. How many users visit your site from mobile devices? Is it worth tailoring content for them?  Do you have anything else you would consider, when writing online?   Further Reading:  You might like my article on &gt; Top 10 Crimes of Online Writing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mobile &#8211; with the increase in mobile browsing, we cannot ignore the necessity for even shorter content. They are prepared to scroll, but not endlessly. How many users visit your site from mobile devices? Is it worth tailoring content for them?  Do you have anything else you would consider, when writing online?   Further Reading:  You might like my article on &gt; Top 10 Crimes of Online Writing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should you buy social media followers? by SEO Copywriter &#8211; a move to the dark side?</title>
		<link>http://carolinebeavon.com/2012/04/30/buying-social-media-followers-quality-v-quantity/comment-page-1/#comment-6139</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Copywriter &#8211; a move to the dark side?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 19:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carolinebeavon.com/?p=3964#comment-6139</guid>
		<description>[...] also: Buying Social Media Followers &gt; quality V quantity  Tags: google, Search Engine Optimization, Web content, Web search [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also: Buying Social Media Followers &gt; quality V quantity  Tags: google, Search Engine Optimization, Web content, Web search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SEO Copywriter &#8211; a move to the dark side? by Quick start your On page SEO &#171; Learning eMarketing</title>
		<link>http://carolinebeavon.com/2012/05/15/seo-copywriter-a-move-to-the-dark-side/comment-page-1/#comment-6138</link>
		<dc:creator>Quick start your On page SEO &#171; Learning eMarketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 18:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carolinebeavon.com/?p=4005#comment-6138</guid>
		<description>[...] SEO Copywriter &#8211; a move to the dark side? (carolinebeavon.com)  Rate this:  Share this:TwitterLinkedInStumbleUponFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SEO Copywriter &#8211; a move to the dark side? (carolinebeavon.com)  Rate this:  Share this:TwitterLinkedInStumbleUponFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using Evernote for Email &gt; tried, tested and failed by dduncombe</title>
		<link>http://carolinebeavon.com/2012/02/05/using-evernote-for-email-tried-tested-and-failed/comment-page-1/#comment-6134</link>
		<dc:creator>dduncombe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 21:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carolinebeavon.com/?p=3724#comment-6134</guid>
		<description>Thanks! I love that idea and I appreciate the analysis. 

Perhaps using gmail labels that are set to autoforward might do the trick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! I love that idea and I appreciate the analysis. </p>
<p>Perhaps using gmail labels that are set to autoforward might do the trick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should you buy social media followers? by Caroline Beavon</title>
		<link>http://carolinebeavon.com/2012/04/30/buying-social-media-followers-quality-v-quantity/comment-page-1/#comment-6133</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline Beavon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carolinebeavon.com/?p=3964#comment-6133</guid>
		<description>I do see your &quot;if you have them, more will come&quot; point - and I guess, depending on your field, that may work in your favour - especially if you are targeting companies who are a little naive about social media methods. 

I do stand by my point that you may eventually get MORE RTs, clicks etc if you gained loyal/interested followers who KEEP coming back - not ones who are clicking on a link once and never returning. 

I guess for companies  demanding fast return, this is as effective as any mailshot campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do see your &#8220;if you have them, more will come&#8221; point &#8211; and I guess, depending on your field, that may work in your favour &#8211; especially if you are targeting companies who are a little naive about social media methods. </p>
<p>I do stand by my point that you may eventually get MORE RTs, clicks etc if you gained loyal/interested followers who KEEP coming back &#8211; not ones who are clicking on a link once and never returning. </p>
<p>I guess for companies  demanding fast return, this is as effective as any mailshot campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should you buy social media followers? by Chris Unitt</title>
		<link>http://carolinebeavon.com/2012/04/30/buying-social-media-followers-quality-v-quantity/comment-page-1/#comment-6132</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Unitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carolinebeavon.com/?p=3964#comment-6132</guid>
		<description>Excuse me playing devil&#039;s advocate here. I certainly wouldn&#039;t recommend buying followers in this way, but…

The value of the followers you&#039;d be buying might be low in terms of engagement/conversion (although you never know - it&#039;d probably be the case if your offer is very targeted, but if it&#039;s entirely generic…?) but then what about some of the ancillary benefits you might get?

Once you&#039;ve got a solid baseline of (albeit &#039;worthless&#039;) followers, more valuable people coming across your account might be more likely to follow you. There might be a social proof thing with people thinking &#039;well, all those people can&#039;t be wrong&#039;.

If your business model relates to advertising and page views then clicks on any of the links you tweet will be valuable - more followers = greater possibility of more clicks (sorry, slightly woolly point but hopefully you get what I mean). Also, any RTs, +1s, etc that result will contribute in some small way to SEO.

There could be additional PR value - those lists of &#039;most followed accounts in x sector&#039; are as popular as they are (largely) meaningless.

And if you sell yourself on social media savvy then a quick way to impress a less informed client is to show that your own social media accounts are popular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me playing devil&#8217;s advocate here. I certainly wouldn&#8217;t recommend buying followers in this way, but…</p>
<p>The value of the followers you&#8217;d be buying might be low in terms of engagement/conversion (although you never know &#8211; it&#8217;d probably be the case if your offer is very targeted, but if it&#8217;s entirely generic…?) but then what about some of the ancillary benefits you might get?</p>
<p>Once you&#8217;ve got a solid baseline of (albeit &#8216;worthless&#8217;) followers, more valuable people coming across your account might be more likely to follow you. There might be a social proof thing with people thinking &#8216;well, all those people can&#8217;t be wrong&#8217;.</p>
<p>If your business model relates to advertising and page views then clicks on any of the links you tweet will be valuable &#8211; more followers = greater possibility of more clicks (sorry, slightly woolly point but hopefully you get what I mean). Also, any RTs, +1s, etc that result will contribute in some small way to SEO.</p>
<p>There could be additional PR value &#8211; those lists of &#8216;most followed accounts in x sector&#8217; are as popular as they are (largely) meaningless.</p>
<p>And if you sell yourself on social media savvy then a quick way to impress a less informed client is to show that your own social media accounts are popular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adventures #1 &#8211; SoLoMoDEN by Five take-aways from the #solomoDEN event &#171; Sarah Hartley</title>
		<link>http://carolinebeavon.com/2012/02/24/adventures-1-solomoden/comment-page-1/#comment-6099</link>
		<dc:creator>Five take-aways from the #solomoDEN event &#171; Sarah Hartley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 15:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carolinebeavon.com/?p=3771#comment-6099</guid>
		<description>[...] There’s also more information at this live blog by Daniel Bentley  and this blog post from Caroline Beavon. Feel free to drop any other links to coverage in the comments below. Like this:LikeBe the first to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There’s also more information at this live blog by Daniel Bentley  and this blog post from Caroline Beavon. Feel free to drop any other links to coverage in the comments below. Like this:LikeBe the first to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 10 Crimes of Online Writing by Julie Toft</title>
		<link>http://carolinebeavon.com/2011/03/04/top-10-crimes-of-online-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-6052</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Toft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 11:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carolinebeavon.com/?p=3255#comment-6052</guid>
		<description>10. linking instead of explaining. It annoys me, if the writer doesn&#039;t bother to explain or clarify difficult parts/concepts but links to a wikipedia page instead. That&#039;s just laziness. All the info you need to understand the text should be in the text. I think. 

Great post, by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10. linking instead of explaining. It annoys me, if the writer doesn&#8217;t bother to explain or clarify difficult parts/concepts but links to a wikipedia page instead. That&#8217;s just laziness. All the info you need to understand the text should be in the text. I think. </p>
<p>Great post, by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 10 Crimes of Online Writing by Chie Elliott</title>
		<link>http://carolinebeavon.com/2011/03/04/top-10-crimes-of-online-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-6051</link>
		<dc:creator>Chie Elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 22:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carolinebeavon.com/?p=3255#comment-6051</guid>
		<description>Great post, Caroline, with good points we all need to be reminded of from time to time (it&#039;s so easy to get carried away or become too lazy...), whether we are pros or beginners. PS: I didn&#039;t know about Zemanta -- top tip, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Caroline, with good points we all need to be reminded of from time to time (it&#8217;s so easy to get carried away or become too lazy&#8230;), whether we are pros or beginners. PS: I didn&#8217;t know about Zemanta &#8212; top tip, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 10 Crimes of Online Writing by URL Gist! &#171; Diary of a Media Junkie</title>
		<link>http://carolinebeavon.com/2011/03/04/top-10-crimes-of-online-writing/comment-page-1/#comment-6050</link>
		<dc:creator>URL Gist! &#171; Diary of a Media Junkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 08:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carolinebeavon.com/?p=3255#comment-6050</guid>
		<description>[...] Online Journalism student dropped heavy tips on the Top Ten Crimes of Online Writing. If I thought I had it all together, this young lady told me WASSAP! It is a punchy and informative [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Online Journalism student dropped heavy tips on the Top Ten Crimes of Online Writing. If I thought I had it all together, this young lady told me WASSAP! It is a punchy and informative [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

